![]() The depiction of the HAL 9000 (Heuristically-programmed Algorithmic Computer) in 2001 remains one of the film's most eerie elements. This shouldn't be seen as a mistake, because Kubrick was famous for paring down dialogue in order to speed up the pace of a film. Then, there would be no way Poole could stop HAL. Poole then would be forced to play Qh6 in order to prevent his queen being taken by a pawn. In addition to the moves he describes, HAL can also win by playing Nh3. Although HAL incompletely describes the checkmate setup, he was accurate in declaring victory. From this information, we know that Poole is a beginner and, perhaps, learned the game on-board the Discovery to pass the time. It's certainly not a tournament game as has been suggested. The fact that an otherwise insignificant game is recorded implies that this was a teaching game. Roesch makes several beginner's mistakes. This game was based on a game played between Willi Schlage, a tournament player, and a mysterious person named Roesch-mysterious, because nobody seems to know his first name, and there is some disagreement in what year this game was played. When HAL makes his final move, he mistakenly says "queen to bishop three" instead of "queen to bishop six." This error foreshadowed HAL's mistake with the AE-35 diagnosis, indicating that something was wrong. In one interview, Kubrick refers to the monoliths as "Jungian archetypes." Edit Whilst this may or may not be the answer imagined by Kubrick, it is a significant part of Clarke's vision that helps explain the plot to some extent. Clarke reveal that the monoliths are alien supercomputers capable of self replication. Not pointed out in the movie: The monoliths are 1 × 4 × 9 in dimension-1 squared by 2 squared by 3 squared (or in short, 1² × 2² × 3²), as stated in Clarke's novel and also in the film's sequel, 2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984). Whether this is the same monolith that sent him through the Stargate, as Kubrick's own comments suggest, or a different monolith, as certain interpreters believe, remains a question open to debate. A monolith appears at the foot of Bowman's bed immediately before his transformation and it sends him, as the Starchild, back to Earth. The third, located at the Lagrange point between Io and Jupiter, either leads to and opens or is itself the door to the stargate transporting Bowman to his destiny. The confusion arises due to an edit (what may be a time cut) to the sun appearing above the monolith. The lunar night is too long for the sun to rise during the short time Floyd is at the site. While the monolith is activated by sunlight in the novel, it is completely lit by artificial lighting in the film when it emits its signal. The second, found on the moon, emitted a powerful radio signal directed at Jupiter. ![]() The hominids' contact with the first, in the "Dawn of Man" sequence, sparked the discovery of tools/weapons. Each of the three monoliths has a different purpose. ![]() They are placed to observe and, in Kubrick's words, "influence" the "evolutionary progression" of humanity. ![]() The monoliths are tools of a highly advanced alien civilization. A sequel movie, 2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984), was released in 1984. ![]() It also included a copy of The Sentinel and excerpts from the early screenplay that did not make it into the final version of the film. In 1972, Clarke published The Lost Worlds of 2001, a compilation of behind-the-scenes notes about the script and production issues. It was Clarke's belief that Kubrick intentionally delayed signing off on Clarke's version so that the movie would be released first. The novel was scheduled to be released prior to the film pending Kubrick's approval of the book's content. As they were working on the screenplay, they were also placing their ideas into a book that was subsequently published in 1968 by Clarke under the same title as the movie. Clarke based on Clarke's 1950 short story "The Sentinel". 2001: A Space Odyssey began as an idea by director Stanley Kubrick to create the "proverbial good science fiction movie." He developed the screenplay in collaboration with British science fiction author Sir Arthur C. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |